At long last we know who the candidates are going to be. I, personally, hope that Obama chooses Hillary as his running mate despite the issues of electoral value and the unpredictability of Bill. As to John McCain, I am indifferent to his choice so long as the end result is a loss for the Republicans.
This is not to say that I don’t respect John McCain. He has earned our respect by what he did for the country, even though he almost erased that claim to respect by his unsavory involvement with Charles Keating and the Savings and Loan scandal. But no one will remember that, and even if they did, few of us have any real understanding of its true significance and complexities.
My concern now is the way our electoral system turns candidates’ assets into liabilities, and the way the press foments these misinterpretations. You may rest assured that the candidate who grows and changes his opinion will be accused of “waffling” and “flip-flopping.” The candidate who attempts to be civil and accommodating will be questioned about his toughness. Acting the belligerent bully will be seen as a sign of leadership qualities. Thus it has always been, even when wrapped in soft velvet as it was by Ronald Reagan. One can only hope that the current cabal of jackals — Bush, Rove, Cheney, and Rumsfeld — has soured us on such behavior and revealed its dangerous underbelly.
What bothers me the most is that the nature and quality of discourse that we accept from our candidates would result in our children being sent to their rooms if they were to practice it with their friends. Already we have seen McCain become a barking terrier nipping at Obama’s flesh; Obama become dissembling and disingenuous when forced to jettison his friend and mentor, Jeremiah Wright; and Hillary become a passive-aggressive whiner taking around-the-corner shots at Obama and the press for situations almost entirely of her own creation.
This is a sad state of affairs. These are good people. We each have our horse in the race, but anyone with an ounce of forgiveness and compassion sees that these, and the other candidates now fallen by the wayside, are concerned human beings with strengths and flaws no different than our own. Unlike the present administration, I see no cruelty in any of them. Yet our measure of their worthiness is their success at a game of “gotcha!” If they can avoid getting caught more than their opponents, they are likely to win.
What I would like to see is an attitude of tolerance and forgiveness on the part of each of the candidates and the press. Allow the candidates to be themselves, to make mistakes, to correct their mistakes, and to move on. Let them reveal themselves to best advantage in a long, slow unwinding of their thoughts and beliefs and ideas about governing. Give them room to adapt and grow.
Then, make your choice.
By my lights, the choice should not be hard. But the issue beneath the issue is that we must find a way to allow our candidates to show themselves to best advantage, not to measure their worthiness by how well they stand up under absurd questioning and relentless, often irrational and irrelevant scrutiny. To say that this sort of pressure is what is needed to temper the presidential steel is to promote a negative as a way to uncover a positive. It’s like saying if I spank my child enough, I’ll find out what he or she is made of. Perhaps this is a good way to determine who will be a good Marine, but, I submit, it is not a good way to raise a child or to determine who will be a good president.
So let’s watch and see how this plays out. We may well have broken some barriers in who we can choose as candidates. Now it’s time to break some barriers in finding ways to assess them.
5 thoughts on “Swiftboating our candidates”
Well, from what I can tell Republicans look to be angling by equating Obama as “the next Jimmy Carter.” I’ll admit that I find myself skeptical about nearly all politicians because to rise to the top you usually have to have paid some basement dues along the way. Thats why I loved Edwards. He was the only one taking NO money from lobbyists but the networks never gave him airtime compared to Clinton and Obama very early on.
I think Clinton could make a good running mate but the irrational hatred that the Clintons evoke in so many also can be quite taxing and exhausting. I don’t know. I just don’t want McCain. Like you, I respect and am grateful to his service but he has been back a LONG time and passed enough votes for things that I simply cannot agree with him on. Its going to be an interesting next five months!!
Sending a hug your way Kent!
I cannot see Barack Obama selecting Hillary as his running mate. The person selected to be a vice-president should be one who is 100% behind the president. Hillary would have her own agenda and the complication of having Bill tagging along. There are many other qualified candidates who would make excellent running mates for Obama. If he chooses Hillary, he better select an Official Food and Drink Taster just in case.
We don’t need another 8 or 16 years of the Clintons in the White House. That would be too much! I would prefer that Obama select another US Senator like Joe Biden who could provide him seasoned advice in Foreign Affairs and the needed military expertise. At least those are my thoughts.
Your blog is an excellent one. It makes me think. Thanks. Eric
Nice write up. I am from the UK and not really kept up with the Presidential race, its been a long time since I heard the phrase “flip-flopping”, last time was during Bush Vs. Kerry on Fox News where Kerry was being accused of wearing flip flops.
Obama or Hillary Clinton? I don’t give a fuck, because your all still locked inside this flesh prison.
I have just lost interest in the whole process. I don’t feel I have a voice or a choice. It is not an America that is the voice of the people. It is the voice of the media that decides. Our choices are unknown or known too much. It is no longer one nation under God.