moral outrage and peripatetic dogs
Here’s an issue for you, and I mean it seriously. You obviously need not respond, but it bears some reflection:
I can write about the criminality of car companies avoiding responsibility for near fatal crashes, and I hear almost nothing. I can write about a war that is maiming young children and leaving them homeless, and I hear nary a peep. But write about a dog that runs free and the floodgates open.
Why is this? Are we touched only by those things that brush against our own reality in a palpable way? Do we despair of having an effect on issues that are too large and abstract for us to feel any responsibility for change, and thus feel them less keenly? Or is it something altogether different?
Any of you have any thoughts you want to share?Posted on: March 11, 2007knerburn